Tuesday, September 28, 2010

VISIONS Youth Works program concludes for 2010




2010 VISIONS Youth Works program staff, supporters and student participants. (Photo by Tom Martin)

VISIONS Youth Works Summer Employment program concluded for this year with a ceremony at Northumberland High School on Tuesday, September 14th. This employment program is financed primarily by the Jesse Ball duPont Fund and is made possible with the cooperation, funding and support of VISIONS, Lancaster Community Library, Bay Aging Community Action Partnership, Rappahannock Community College, Lancaster and Northumberland High Schools, Macedonia Baptist Church and local employers.

Forty students were involved in the Youth Works program, twenty from Northumberland and twenty from Lancaster County. Each student was matched with an employer, with the grant providing funding for the actual wages earned. Rusty Bragg, program coordinator of the Workforce and Community Developement department at Rappahannock Community College, acted as program director. Project coordinator Bonnie Davis and tutors Alex Stickler and Jovity Kelly worked with all the students to assess and develop job readiness. Bonnie Davis reported that 37 of the 40 students completed the summer employment program.

At the ceremony, those students who completed the program were honored and presented with Career Readiness Certificates. Thanks to a matching gift from Bay Aging CAP, students also received gas cards. Employers and family came out to enjoy these students' wonderful accomplishments.

Rusty Bragg notes that Youth Works develops the workforce from our community. "We have some talented and responsible young people in our area who would love the opportunity to contribute to their home community. This program gives them the chance to do just that."

DuPont has funded VISIONS Youth Works for a three year period, so this program will continue for the next two summers. Students will continue to have the opportunity to learn important skills and behaviors that will allow them to experience success in the working world.

Monday, August 16, 2010

The year in review!

May 2009 Hired the project coordinator, Alison Towles, who immediately began working with the Visions team to plan the conference scheduled for June.

June 2009 Representatives from Lancaster, Northumberland, Richmond and Westmoreland Counties came together at a conference on June 11th. Citizens, county administrators, educators, pastors, social service and many other interested parties discussed the problem of poverty and began the process of a community-wide conversation on ways to alleviate it. Jean Burkhardt and Gwen Whiting facilitated and the Visions executive team led the way.

August 2009 Gwen Whiting led a two night introduction to a curriculum called Thriving Communities, provided by Everyday Democracy. Gwen demonstrated how Thriving Communities would generate dialog and action around poverty.

September and October 2009 A small group of enthusiastic volunteers, led by Rev. Torrence Harman and Marilyn Warren, engaged in a pilot “community conversation” to try the process out.

October 2009 Alison Towles and Cindy Balderson (Connect Rappahannock) held the first Lancaster – Northumberland Resource Sharing Forum, which has met monthly ever since.

November and December 2009 Communications committee worked with Susan McFadden of Open Door Communications on logo design and mailing packets to promote participation in Community Conversations on Reducing Poverty. Those packets went out to nearly 70 churches and agencies in January 2010.

Also in January 2010, the first facilitator training was provided by Gwen Whiting and the Kick-off Event for the Community Conversations was held. Participants were organized into what ultimately became 6 groups.

February and March 2010 Community conversations met in Heathsville, Kilmarnock, Lancaster and White Stone for 5 weeks.

March 27, 2010 Action Forum was held and all participants came together to share their ideas and thoughts.

April 2010 Evaluation and analysis of results of the Action Forum shared with advisory board and drafted into preliminary report.

Financial report indicated further funds, so….

June 2010 Gwen Whiting provided training for more facilitators, so we can continue the conversations in September, while working toward presentation of an implementation grant to the DuPont Fund.

In short, a productive and informative year that has included more than 120 people in the effort to find meaningful, innovative and effective ways to reduce poverty, build assets, and improve lives.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Lancaster Community Library VISIONS YouthWorks Program

The program initiated last year, then called the Summer Jobs for Youth program, has been funded for the next three years by duPont and renamed the YouthWorks program.

The program summary for last year, prepared by Lindsy Gardner, is linked below:

http://tinyurl.com/33kzvcy

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Report to the Northern Neck Housing Study Group

The Northern Neck Housing Study Group has asked that we make the Report, prepared by czbLLC in partnership with Virginia Tech and presented in March of 2009, available to all on this blog. This housing study, made possible by the duPont Fund, was an effort to assess the situation in the Northern Neck with an eye toward possible solutions.

http://tinyurl.com/22tdhlk

Please be warned that it is quite long and it may take a few minutes for the pdf image to sharpen up to a readable level. Patience, please!


Thursday, May 6, 2010

Summary report on evaluation results


“I am so proud of our community for doing this and proud to have participated. Thank you!”

The first round of Community Conversations on Reducing Poverty in the Northern Neck concluded with an Action Forum on March 27, 2010. This was just one of many positive statements made on participant evaluations at that meeting.

In collecting data from participant registrations and from these evaluations, we can make some observations about who chose to commit to this dialog-to-action process – and, more importantly, who was not included.

The registration forms indicated that we had more than 50 people who signed up formally, although more actually participated. About 60% were female, and 40% were male. They ranged in age from 22 to 80+ years, with a remarkably even distribution between the age range of 40 to 60 or more. However, very few participants were younger than 40, resulting in a mean age of 59. In response to a question about racial/ethnic background, about 25% identified themselves as African American and 75% as Caucasian. The religious affiliations were diverse, with 11 different religions or churches represented. Their stated political views also showed variety. “Moderate” views dominated, with even distribution of conservative and liberal stances.

All but one participant had some college or more education, with 14 having graduate or advanced degrees. Many of them indicated they engaged in volunteer and political activities and, not surprisingly, they were very involved in the community.

Most telling of all the statistics was the annual income. Only two reported incomes under $25,000 per year. The largest number of participants came from the range of $25,000 to $100,000 per year. A few even reported higher incomes.

What does all this mean?

It means we need to get more people who actually experience poverty directly into our conversation. It means we need to recruit more African Americans to contribute. And it means we need to hear from younger people.

But it also means that we were able to get about 60 people to care enough about poverty in the Northern Neck to commit 2 hours a week for 5 weeks! And the surprising thing is that many of them said that wasn’t enough time, they wanted more. Their ideas were presented with passion and energy, and many had comments to share about the process and the problem. Most of all, they wanted to see changes.

“I will be very disappointed if some action to ameliorate poverty in the Northern Neck does not occur.”

Some sample comments from the evaluations!

What they liked:
• Hearing others viewpoints, ideas and opinions
• Open communication
• Getting to know people they might not have known otherwise
• Enthusiastic, concerned people willing to work on the issue
• The opportunity to discuss a vital topic
• Atmosphere where everyone’s views and ideas were valued
• “Involving so many in this grassroots discussion is excellent for its educational value as well as ‘buy in’ value when solutions are implemented.”
• The intensity of the conversations, the ability to have some really difficult but meaningful conversations.

What they didn’t like:
• Not enough time, not long enough, needed more meetings
• Needed to delve deeper in the issue of race.
• Shock at the extreme level of racism still openly present in our community, on both sides.
• Not enough diversity, not a good cross section. Poor, poorest were not included.
• Did not differentiate between short-range and long-range projects.
• Not enough emphasis on action, need more time to talk about actions and going forward. Strike while the iron is hot!
• Really need a mechanism to welcome and include more marginalized people.
• Need to change the word “poverty” – Very negative and will not attract the voices we need to hear from.

Discussion guide:
In general, they liked the discussion guide, with some reservations. Very few had negative ratings, but many were neutral responses.

Facilitators:
They loved their facilitators! Very few negatives and neutrals, overall agreement that the facilitators did a good job of making them welcome, did not try to influence the group, and explained the process well.

Overall evaluation:
Despite their comments otherwise, they rated the length of each meeting, number of meetings, and number of people in their group “just right” most of the time. The overall rating of the program as a whole was an astonishing mean of 4.4, with 5 being “very good” and 4 as “good.”

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Last, but not least, of the Lancaster proposals!

One of the things to remember as you read over this one is that some form of an integrated resource directory for the Northern Neck is something that many groups have suggested and sought after. This proposal could be a part of several of the other suggestions for a more centralized or coordinated approach. Again, in the Lancaster Community Conversation group's own words:

Action Item
INTEGRATED DATABASE OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES
(Lancaster Visions Group: Proposed 3/27/10)

Goal:

To establish a comprehensive and accessible database of community resources (services & programs)

Reasons needed:
To match community resources to community needs
To encourage cooperation, collaboration and communication among providers
To assist in identifying gaps in services/programs
To decrease duplication of services and programs

Implementation
1.Identify what’s already in place and/or in development such as:
Connect Rappahannock
Visions Resource Sharing meetings
Northumberland/Lancaster Interfaith Services Council (has gathered
information with assistance from St. Andrew’s on 30-40
resources/providers)
Other organizations such as Bay Aging, DSS, CRS, etc. also have information
2.Determine contents/categories
3.Gather information of resources/programs
Specifics on service/program
Contact Person (ex. for future updating)
4.Create database
5.Maintain database including updates

Questions:
1.Limit to Northumberland and Lancaster Counties?
2.Leadership/task force to develop and implement?
3.Who will be responsible for compiling and maintaining the database?
Skilled volunteers to research and input data?
4.How to market this resource and make information available?

Financial Implications:
1.Part-time Database Project Coordinator (paid or volunteer)
2.Web Page design and maintenance (webmaster)

NOTE: This Action Idea may be a “stand alone” project or integrated into the Clearinghouse model Action Idea also proposed by the Lancaster Group.

Monday, April 12, 2010

"I Can, I Will" proposal from the Lancaster group



Here is another thoughtful proposal that came out of the Lancaster Community Conversation.

Action Item
“I CAN, I WILL”
Visions Lancaster Group: Proposed 3/27/10


Goal:

To form a grass roots partnership between Bay Aging and residents of local communities/neighborhoods, connecting Bay Aging Options Counselors with individuals and/or groups who desire to become empowered to advocate for and obtain resources in order to achieve and sustain self-sufficiency.

Description:
Options Counselors would identify trusted and natural leader(s) (patriarch/matriarch types, for example) in a neighborhood or local community who would be engaged to gather together those in the neighborhood/community with like needs and concerns. The counselor and local leader would develop a plan offering effective strategies to gather potential participants for exchange of information on resources at local gatherings. Gatherings would take place in the leader’s home (think “Tupperware parties”) or other accessible, friendly location with the leader as convener.

The desired outcomes would include: self identification of needs and ways to achieve self sufficiency; development of skills and knowledge for advocating for themselves or for a neighborhood/local community’s needs; effective and respectful partnering of providers and those seeking services. The local participants would have ownership of and control over the process. The concept is one of empowerment.

Background:
Bay Aging currently has Options Counselors who provide counseling and assistance to consumers through an emergency services program. The funding for this program ends in this fiscal year.

Bay Aging has noted success in a paradigm that sends Options Counselors in some cases into homes and local communities, partnering with the local resident(s) or family to assist in determining needs and goals and then helping match them with services.

The project proposed in this Action Idea would use and build on an already established and trained base at Bay Aging and their past experience in a process that appears to offer promise for the grass roots partnering we propose.

Financial Considerations:
•Partial funding for Options Counselors
•Stipends and expense reimbursement for local leaders
•Transportation made available to participants, as needed through Bay Transit or some other provider

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Next Lancaster Community Conversation contribution


At left, Cathy Hemans goes into more detail as the rest of us listen carefully.

The Lancaster group had some great ideas. Here's another in their own words:


Action Item
NORTHERN NECK COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER
(Lancaster Visions Group: Proposed 3/27/10

Description:

The Center will be a centralized gathering place, initially for women and their children under school age, where Moms can meet and interact with each other in a comfortable environment. The Center will be a place to visit with each other, form support groups and participate in programs and planned activities, targeting needs and interests determined by participants. The goals of the Center include networking, building support systems and helping people who desire to improve their lives and the lives of their families. The Center will serve as a central resource to provide information concerning area events and programs that will enrich and enhance the lives of those coming to and participating in the Center as well as offering programs and events on site. Supervision, care and enrichment activities will be available for the children during parent participation in adult programs.

Programs and information may include, for example, such topics as:
1. How to start and develop a business
2. Education planning (how to prepare for and get a GED; becoming a CNA; exploring other certifications and/or technical programs; educational opportunities at the community college level, etc. including identifying sources of funding, etc.)
3. Resume building; interviewing techniques; job related issues.
4. Parenting
5. Nutrition; meal planning/preparation
6. Arts, crafts, photography, gardening
7. Budgeting; credit and debt issues; home acquisition planning.
8. Matching volunteer mentor and/or coaches with those interested in one on one or group mentoring/coaching.

Location:
A suggested location might be the former Sears Roebuck store in the Lancaster Shopping Center which could be leased and divided into various spaces depending on type of use. Another possibility might be the development of such a center as an adjunct to the local library.

Staffing
Initially, one or two paid positions: Director, either full time or part-time. Part time would work if center initially open only on designated days. Part time assistant could be helpful. Develop and use volunteers for some functions. Community members with special areas of expertise used for programs.

Other Considerations
Parking
Transportation
Food Availability

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Another Lancaster Community Conversation proposal

Again, the Lancaster group put a lot of thought and effort into their proposals and I'm going to respect that by including them verbatim. This is the second of their five proposed strategies.

Action Item
CENTRALIZED RESOURCE CLEARINGHOUSE FOR LANCASTER & NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTIES
Lancaster Visions Group: Proposed 3/27/10

Description


To establish an “umbrella” service organization for area churches in Lancaster & Northumberland Counties to serve as a clearinghouse to match county residents seeking services and programs to community resources. *

The purpose would be to coordinate and/or utilize church resources (money, volunteers, programs) targeted to social service needs and to provide an effective, coordinated process of interviewing and connecting people with resources. The clearinghouse would work in partnership with all components of the local social services infrastructure, including the local Departments of Social Services.

The clearinghouse could offer satellite intake locations on designated days to accommodate client access. Suggested satellite locations are feasible in locations near or adjacent to where County Courthouse/County DSS are located (for ex. Heathsville for Northumberland Co, Lancaster Courthouse for “Upper” Lancaster Co.).

Current effective “Clearinghouse” models/organizations exist all around the U.S. Examples include: ACTS in Richmond, VA; ACTC in the Baltimore, MD area; LOVE, Inc. in multiple locations, etc. Other models may vary as to emphasis : 1) simply connecting needs and resources; 2) providing some services (ex. Food Pantry, Thrift store) directly on-site; 3) facilitating/offering “relational” ministries/programming.

Provision of financial and programmatic resources as distributed by government funded agencies such as local Departments of Social Services (DSS) have criteria which limit accessibility, dependent on the funding program. Other non-profit organizations (ex. Bay Aging) that utilize government grants/funding also have limitations placed on distribution. A “privately” funded clearinghouse organization has greater flexibility to assist those who fall outside the “criteria” required by government funded programs.

Some features of the Clearinghouse Model:
The program would include a paid Director (part-time or full time). It would utilize trained volunteers:
To interview and screen clients
To manage and maintain computerized data base
Of clients and use of services
Of available resources (see Lancaster Group Action Plan re Integrated Data Base)

The duties of the Director would include:
•Train and coordinate volunteers
•Oversee data bases
•Maintain contact/communication with other public (i.e. DSS’s) and private service organizations
•Serve as liaison with churches and clergy
•Develop/implement marketing and publicity strategies
•Manage operations budget, subject to Board

Funding
•From grants
•From participating churches who are able to provide funding
•In kind provision of space by churches and of volunteers

Reasons Needed

•Churches who have financial resources to distribute to people in need and people desiring assistance to help them achieve financial stability could benefit from the coordination and centralization of certain functions that make screening and distribution most effective. It is a time consuming process when decentralized fraught with concerns that our distribution from church to church may not be reaching the people who are really in need and who desire to move into longer term financial stability.
•It is a way for smaller churches, less financially able, to participate in a network of service provision and be an integral part of the connection of area residents to services.
•It offers an opportunity for all the churches, whatever the denomination, whatever the population they serve, to come together, to develop relational ministries and to serve the common good.
•It eases the access challenges for potential clients, who at this time, go from church to church, service organization to service organization, as they seek assistance.
•The ministerial associations (Lancaster and Northumberland) have identified a need to examine some form of centralization of certain functions and greater coordination of identification and distribution of church and community resources.
•It would help reduce the overuse of financial assistance by those individuals who utilize the system to perpetuate a dependent lifestyle and model such to continuing generations.
•It would better assure that the limited financial resources are distributed in a way that would more effectively impact poverty in the Northern Neck and assist those who desire to achieve financial stability and independence.
•It could help decrease overlap and/or duplication of services.
•It could help identify gaps in services/programming that may be needed for area residents and stimulate the development of such.


*Alternative would be to develop this model within an existing non-for-profit organization, such as Church Resource Service (CRS) or Lancaster/Northumberland Interfaith Services Council

Monday, April 5, 2010

The first of the Lancaster Action Forum plans!

The Lancaster group, facilitated by Torrence Harman and Lorraine Justice, came up with a number of very well thought out plans. Because they put so much effort into communicating their ideas and suggestions, I am going to post just one, in their own words, each day. My hope is that this will allow time to read and really absorb what their strategies involve. It's the best substitute I can make for their actual presentation.

Action Item
FROM POVERTY TO PROSPERITY
(Lancaster Visions Group: Proposed 3/27/10)


Goal:

To create opportunities for those in poverty (especially young people) to be exposed to/interact with role models who have moved from poverty to prosperity with the goal to motivate, inspire and support those in poverty towards productive lives and financial stability.

Implementation:

Identify local community persons who are knowledgeable about families and individuals who have prospered here and whose children are employed and working in various capacities successfully in other areas to come and share their success stories at the local level.

Through Guidance Services at the local high schools that track young people whose backgrounds suggest poverty but have achieved success by attending community colleges, four year colleges, vocational training programs, armed services, apprenticeship programs – thus leading to successful careers and meaningful lives.

Through Departments of Social Services who have familiarity with those persons/families who have availed themselves of employment and educational opportunities leading to more stable life styles.

Through local churches who have direct access to families they have helped financially as well as spiritually to a better life – one no longer in poverty speaking to interested groups in their churches.

Identify and establish opportunities for the above to share their stories (motivational – from poverty to prosperity) with young people in this area. For example:

*At Career Days at the local high schools.

*Through church sponsored events targeting those in youth programs in local churches.

*Reinforce and support youth motivated to make good decisions about education, health and employment with programs such as:

Local health personnel, willing to lead discussion on the values of maintaining good health and the dangers of young ladies having babies too early for themselves and their young children.

Local employers and others willing to speak with people of limited means and potentially stunted employment futures giving them pointers to possible employment opportunities and ways to advance in their companies. Other speakers providing pointers on resume building, interviewing advice, dressing for employment, etc.

*Reinforce and support families/parents motivated to encourage and support their children in their efforts towards education, training, financial stability, independence and good decision making with efforts such as:

Programs on availability of scholarships and other resources to enable continuation of education and/or achievement of certifications

Programs on effective parenting, child and youth development and motivation

Background & Rationale for the Proposed Action Plan

Poverty has many definitions. The U. S. Census stated that in 2005 the poverty line for a family of four was $19,350 per year and for an individual, $9,750. Living on less than this means living in total poverty. Poverty can lead to dependency, hopelessness and despair. Generational coping methods can perpetuate the cycle of poverty and dependency.

The Northern Neck has its share of poverty. Poverty here stems from many things. There never seems to be enough income to insure a decent living. People in poverty suffer from economic deprivation and therefore poor quality of life. To understand how people feel, the following areas should be examined with the question “What it is like . . . .

1. To be hungry?
2. To be homeless or living in substandard homes?
3. To have inadequate or no health care access?
4. To experience poor educational quality?
5. To be in an environment where labor market opportunities are lacking with a high percentage of adults in rural areas unemployed.?
6. To live in a neighborhood with a poor quality of life and few or no role models to demonstrate ways to better their conditions of life?

The list could be expanded with statistics showing more than 1 in 6 persons in rural areas listed as being poor.

Question: Is there a proven method to move from poverty to prosperity? The answer is “Yes!” There are people from this area that have succeeded despite all odds. As former first lady, Hillary Clinton stated, “It takes a village to raise a child.” Education and meaningful work opportunities are paths one must take and use to get out of poverty. The key is to help motivate our young people to see that such paths are within reach and achievable by being exposed to real life success stories who share what is needed to reach the goals of an improved, stable and prosperous way of life.

The Commonwealth of Virginia’s Poverty Reduction Task Force states that learning and skill development is a cumulative, lifelong process. Thus, preschool intervention that helps develop cognitive and socio-emotional skills have a higher return on families’ movement out of poverty than trying intervention later. Quality education beginning in pre-school or earlier makes the path into life learning and the way out of poverty much more likely.

People in poverty must buy into the concept that education and work leads to a better, more productive life. Parents, in particular must guide their children to accept the role of education as their way to a better life. Even if it appears that education hasn’t helped their parents, children must be taught to buy into the concept that a better life comes with being prepared academically. Families who have been able to help guide their children to use education and skill building as their road map to a better life in our area have been successful. Many of these families have children who completed high school, attended community colleges, four year colleges and graduate programs, joined the armed services obtaining training in various skills needed in the world of work, attended vocational schools and apprenticeship programs as well as on the job training, etc. Many of these persons who return to visit family members and some of these same people who now live and work in this area may be willing and would be very effective to speak with groups of people, especially young people, to demonstrate ways they used to move from poverty to prosperity. These people need to be people willing to help people in poverty to move to prosperity without making those in poverty feel like second class people. People in poverty must feel and understand that those trying to help are sincere and focused in their desire to help.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

More from the Action Forum

The White Stone group was a large one. They met on Saturday evenings, sharing a meal, and then split into three smaller groups. Each group made one recommendation. Lance Barton, one of the facilitators, presented those ideas.

One group suggested a publication cataloging resources available in the Northern Neck. This would be used as a guide by churches and other organizations to direct individuals to these resources based on their needs.

Another group proposed a centralized food bank warehouse in the Northern Neck that would support existing food banks. It would provide food to area food banks at very little cost, organize food drives, and help with basic logistics for running a food bank (dry goods and cold storage). This Food Bank Warehouse would provide food to individuals on a referral basis, but its primary function is to support new and existing food banks.

A third group would like to see the organization of a panel/community conversation made up of individuals who have come out of poverty and a comprehensive report of the results.



Dave Alberts and Marilyn Warren co-facilitated a Community Conversation in Kilmarnock. Dave presented their report. It is posted here in its entirety.


VISION

We are a caring, compassionate, diverse community working together to build hope and prosperity for all.


ISSUE

Each of the many organizations in the Northern Neck serves a clientele segment but sometimes competes or overlaps with other organizations or efforts. These varied individual efforts of organizations need to come together to better coordinate and extend their services.


IDEAS

•Support the efforts of the churches through the Interfaith Council to coordinate their services to those in need

•Develop a broadly inclusive universal community resources “catalog”, website and contact centers; i.e. a Clearinghouse

•Supplement volunteer-run programs with part-time trained staff

•Support the expansion of broadband communication as a resource for on-line learning and job searching and sharing of community resources. Along with this is the need for more technical training to new or minimally experienced users of the Internet.

•Expand the Youth Summer Jobs Program to include those needing to develop more consistent work ethics. This should be operated year-round and be supported by prospective employers.


mjw & dla
3/22/10

VISIONS would like to thank those organizations that hosted a conversation group, Macedonia Baptist Church in Heathsville, Trinity Episcopal Church in Lancaster, the Lancaster Community Library in Kilmarnock, and White Stone Church of the Nazarene in White Stone.

The Lancaster group presented last. Their suggestions were extremely well thought-out and detailed, so I'll be posting them one at a time over the next few days.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Action Forum held March 27. 2010

The final event of the first round of Community Conversations on Reducing Poverty in the Northern Neck took place on Saturday, March 27th. Paula Fisher, with the Visions steering committee, acted as moderator. She thanked Susan McFadden and Open Door Communications for all their work developing our logo, our promotional and recruitment mailing material. Paula went on to open the meeting with these quotes from The World Bank PovertyNet: "Poverty is hunger. Poverty is lack of shelter. Poverty is being sick and not being able to see a doctor. Poverty is not having access to school and not knowing how to read. Poverty is not having a job, is fear for the future, living one day at a time. Poverty is losing a child to illness brought about by unclean water. Poverty is powerlessness, lack of representation and freedom."


"Poverty is a call to action -- for the poor and the wealthy alike -- a call to change the world so that many more may have enough to eat, adequate shelter, access to education and health, protection from violence, and a voice in what happens in their communities." Paula added, "Community, Community, Comm u-ni-ty, Comm – Unity. This is why we have come together today... to move from dialogue to action in designing a plan to reduce poverty in the Northern Neck."

Each group had an opportunity to share their experience, their process, their vision and their recommendations.



The Heathsville group, represented by Joe Thompson, shared the following report:

Vision:
Communities working together to move from poverty to prosperity
Purpose:
To develop an action plan for reducing poverty in Northumberland, Lancaster and other surrounding counties of Virginia
Background:
Thirteen (13) members and four (4) facilitators participated in five (5) conversation sessions of two hour durations where
a. poverty was defined, and quantified in our communities at 10%
b. problems facing the poor were identified
c. available assets were listed
d. a list of possible actions was developed, analyzed with a consensus reached recommended Action Plan

Recommended Action Plan:
Our recommended Action Plan contains three (3)elements; a Community Coordinator, a focus on jobs and a focus on education.

1. Community Coordinator: We believe our communities have both the people and the assets to reduce poverty, except for a funded Community Coordinator who will develop, coordinate, manage and measure our poverty reduction efforts. For example; we have banks, churches, schools, businesses, etc. who could work on projects; but would need someone to coordinate, organize and measure”collective efforts” full time… a Community Coordinator. Our cost estimate for one person, transportation, telephone, computer and space is $100,000 per year, which we hope would be funded initially by a grant or foundation. Further, this Community Coordinator will need an Advisory Board to guide him/her. Without someone dedicated full time to this effort real success cannot be achieved.

2. Focus on jobs! More jobs..Less poverty, period! Some opportunities are:
1.Establish a Clearinghouse for Jobs/Skills……people looking for work/people seeking jobs. 2. Create a website for free listing. 3. Establish a physical location for connecting.

3. Focus on education! Expand the use of Rappahannock Community College in providing training for jobs (Example: Austin CC “Construction Gateway Program” www.austincc.edu/bct/gateway.php and www.universitybusiness.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=1543) Expand Warsaw VoTech program to adults. Provide counseling for success in work with volunteer counselors. Help people gain literacy skills for further college or skills training. The Community Coordinator will promote children’s mentoring, reading partners, etc. with churches, civic organizations, etc. to help children’s education.

Prepared by Joe M. Thompson 3/24/2010
Presented by Joe M. Thompson & Tom Price

I'll continue to post the plans and recommendations over the next week, so that everyone can give each some attention. Each report represents hours of work by our many volunteers in this process. Thanks to all of them, and a special thanks to our facilitators: Torrence Harman, Lorraine Justice, Jessica Jordan, Kathleen Watson, Dave Alberts, Marilyn Warren, Lance Barton, Jason Hughes, and William Smith.

Monday, March 22, 2010

Community Conversations on Reducing Poverty

VISIONS was successful in organizing four Community Conversations on Reducing Poverty, all full, with one so large it had to be split into 2 or 3 smaller groups. The weather was our biggest obstacle, setting us back in beginning 3 of the conversations until mid-February.

The winner of the "weather dodging" award goes to our Lancaster conversation. Facilitated by Torrence Harman with some help from Lorraine Justice of Bay Aging, they managed to start right away and got in 6 meetings and still finished before everyone else! Trinity Episcopal Church on Mary Ball Road in Lancaster hosted.

The largest group was our White Stone contingent. They had to break up into 3 groups to have their discussions. They met on Saturday evenings and shared a meal. This was a younger group who needed childcare for the 12 children of the participants. Lance Barton organized and oversaw this circle, which met at the White Stone Church of the Nazarene.

The Heathsville group, led by Jessica Jordan and Kathleen Watson, had some lively conversations from the sounds of things. This is the only circle we were able to organize in Northumberland County, so we hope to expand in this area in the future. Our thanks to Pastors Rioland of Macedonia Baptist Church for hosting this conversation.

The Kilmarnock circle met at the Lancaster Community Library on Wednesday nights. Dave Alberts and Marilyn Warren facilitated this conversation. I look forward to hearing about their thoughts and ideas, as this group experienced the most fluctuation in membership and attendance.

All of these groups will come together this Saturday, March 27th, at 10:30 a.m. for the Action Forum. We will be meeting at the Upper Lancaster Ruritan Center on Route 201 near Lively. The Action Forum will provide all of our Community Conversation groups a chance to share their experience and their ideas with the larger group as a whole. Lunch will be provided and participants will have an opportunity to complete an evaluation form with their thoughts and feedback on the dialogue-to-action process.

The Action Forum is open to the public. Please let me know if you plan to attend at 577-8421 or visions.lcl@gmail.com

Monday, January 25, 2010

January events


January has been a busy month for VISIONS. As promised, Susan McFadden and her team at Open Door Communications produced all the materials for our mailing about the Community Conversations on Reducing Poverty. The only cost to VISIONS was the postage. Susan designed the wonderful poster seen here. The mailing went out the end of the first week in January to about 75 churches and agencies. Lindsy Gardner also promoted the program at a meeting of the Rotary Club and met with Robert Mason, the editor of the Rappahannock Record. The Record ran a great article on Community Conversations on the Thursday before the Kick-Off event.

Gwen Whiting came from Richmond on January 16th to train the executive committee and some volunteers to be facilitators for the Community Conversations. It was a day-long training and gave us all a feel for the entire process. We worked through all five weeks in one day and took turns facilitating each session. It was an eye-opener and we all learned a great deal. The turnout was low, however, so it may be hard to schedule facilitators for the groups.

The Kick-Off Event for the Community Conversations on Reducing Poverty was held at the Upper Lancaster Ruritan Center near Lively on January 23rd. The Ruritans very generously made this space available to us for free, since they felt this effort will benefit the community. Pastor Ken Rioland did a wonderful job of inspiring all those who attended. Delegate Albert Pollard was there and we were able to provide him with information on the dialogue-to-action process we are undertaking. We had a good turnout of nearly 30 people, and there are many more who expressed an interest in participating who could not be there. We are on target to begin four groups in February. We were able to organize and settle on times and venues for all four groups. I continue to get emails and registration forms, so I believe all four groups will be full.